[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: woody kernel question



Just my two cents. You seem like a decently experienced user, but confused
about upgrading kernels. You don't *have* to run 2.4.18-pre9 like everyone
else is telling you to. 2.4.17 should be fine for your needs, and you can
upgrade to 2.4.18 later when it's actually released.

- Jordan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul E Condon" <pecondon@quiknet.com>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: woody kernel question


> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:56:29PM -0800, Geoff Ludwiczak wrote:
> > I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past couple days and see no
> > problems with it so far.  I was using 2.4.17 before, and had no troubles
with
> > it either.  Try 2.4.17, but if you're going to use 2.2, then just use
2.2.20.
> >
>
> Thanks, but now I have another question. Where does one find 2.4.18-pre9?
> When I read your message, I thought gee that's strange 2.2.17 is the
highest
> version that I saw at http.us.debian.org. So I did update again in dselect
and
> still see no 2.4.18-pre9. Where is it found?
>
>
>
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:34:00PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > > I have just done dist-upgrade from Potato to Woody. I have been
using/learning
> > > Debian for a few months. This was the first serious change from my
initial
> > > installation. The upgrade went smoothly, but took a while at 56k. I
found many
> > > nice improvements, but saw that the kernel had not been upgraded. I
suppose I
> > > could have known this before hand if I had read the right documents
more
> > > carefully, but I didn't.
> > >
> > > Now I look at the offerings of kernels in dselect. Which is
recommended?
> > > Of course I have to choose one that corresponds to my CPU, but what of
> > > versioning? I see 2.2.20, 2.4.13, 2.4.14, 2.4.16, and 2.4.17. There
are
> > > limits to my adventurousness. Which is the likely choise for the
default
> > > Woody kernel when it becomes "stable"? I think I would like to use
that one
> > > if there are not good reasons to avoid it now.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > --
> > > Paul E Condon
> > > pecondon@quiknet.com
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
>
> --
> Paul E Condon
> pecondon@quiknet.com
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>



Reply to: