Re: woody kernel question
I have been using kernel 2.4.18-pre9 for the past couple days and see no
problems with it so far. I was using 2.4.17 before, and had no troubles with
it either. Try 2.4.17, but if you're going to use 2.2, then just use 2.2.20.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:34:00PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have just done dist-upgrade from Potato to Woody. I have been using/learning
> Debian for a few months. This was the first serious change from my initial
> installation. The upgrade went smoothly, but took a while at 56k. I found many
> nice improvements, but saw that the kernel had not been upgraded. I suppose I
> could have known this before hand if I had read the right documents more
> carefully, but I didn't.
>
> Now I look at the offerings of kernels in dselect. Which is recommended?
> Of course I have to choose one that corresponds to my CPU, but what of
> versioning? I see 2.2.20, 2.4.13, 2.4.14, 2.4.16, and 2.4.17. There are
> limits to my adventurousness. Which is the likely choise for the default
> Woody kernel when it becomes "stable"? I think I would like to use that one
> if there are not good reasons to avoid it now.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Paul E Condon
> pecondon@quiknet.com
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: