[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Vs RedHat

also sprach Robert L. Harris <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net> [2002.01.09.2146 +0100]:
> Debian:
>   Server Oriented

not necessarily... it's pretty alround if you ask me. and so is redhat,

>   Publicly available 3 tier development cycle (dev, test, production)
>   Publicly available bug archive for testing and searching
>   System layout is SYSV like Solaris

strictly in accordance with the FHS
it has proper standards
it has excellent mailing lists
it's non-profit
it's the "cleanest linux" next to slackware
it *is* well known
it's international

> RedHat:
>   No pre-installed install/update tool (apt)

in fact, if you want to use the update service, you'll pay!

>   System layout is BSD

huh? i don't think so.

it's commercial
it's american

martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
"driving with a destination
 is like having sex to have children"
                                             -- backwater wayne miller

Attachment: pgppJVTHiIaF6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: