[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Man deprecated, Info not there, -doc package? (was Re: Where do you RTFM ?)



on Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 08:07:40AM -0600, Colin Watson (cjwatson@debian.org) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 02:21:55AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 03:54:36AM -0200, Christoph Simon (ciccio@kiosknet.com.br) wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 20:38:49 -0800
> > > "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >     ...followed by dire warnings that the manpage may not be updated,
> > > >     etc., etc.  At which point the pitiless reader turns to the info
> > > >     document...which in many cases is a copy of the same manpage (now
> > > >     presented in an unfamiliar document viewer).  Houston, we've got a
> > > >     problem.
> > > 
> > > This is the choice of debian maintainers.
> > 
> > Looks to me more like someone dropped the ball.  "Gee...GNU doesn't do
> > man pages, so we'll note that in the man page, but I don't feel like
> > writing an info page....".
> 
> No, usually what's happened in these cases is that the man page is in
> the main package while the info pages are in a separate -doc package
> which you haven't got installed. When you type info, it can't find the
> real info page, so it reverts to its neutered "try to view man pages"
> mode instead.

Hmm...

If this is the case, I'd suggest it's a bug in Debian, and the man page
should indicate that, not only is the Info page preferred, but that, if
it's not found on the system, the appropriate Debian -doc package should
be installed.

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?              Home of the brave
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/                    Land of the free
We freed Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire                      http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html

Attachment: pgpkvUgyzKBFD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: