[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: corrupted partion table



On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 01:32:52AM +0000, ben wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > The question is, if I run fdisk to redefine the partion table (from a
> > > bootable potato cd), will fdisk only touch the sectors where the
> > > partion table is installed, or will it wipe out the data on the
> > > partions as well.
> 
> > 
> > fdisk *only* modifies the partition table.  It's not touching the data
> > on it, so you can try combinations without fear.  I think (and have been
> > through this, but if anyone knows differently, speak up). 
> 
> 
> cfdisk is more user friendly and allegedly more reliable than fdisk,
> which is notorious for not doing exactly as one would expect. fdisk is
> suitable to partition a new disk but to protect data that already
> exists, i would go with cfdisk.

I think you've got this exactly backwards, with the possible exception
of cfdisk being "more user freindly" if that means hiding details from
the user.

-- 
Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better
Micromuse Ltd.                 | than a perfect plan tomorrow.
mailto:nnorman@micromuse.com   |   -- Patton

Attachment: pgp__pcHR1TF6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: