on Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:15:44AM -0500, Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson@mindspring.com) wrote: > > Hmmm...I still think that's moderately f*cked -- anyone who's > > transmitting linux kernel sources is sending more than a few > > obscenities. I'm also of the mind that there's a time and a place for > > strong language, and computers are frequently both. > > What does 'transmitting linux kernel sources' have to do with this ?? I > think that would be in violation of this rule: Hint: patch. BTW, you might also keep your attribution lines intact. In this case, the material quoted in your post was mine, unattributed. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
Attachment:
pgp_BJluOv8LL.pgp
Description: PGP signature