[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: networking problem during install



on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:08:22PM -0700, Bob Galloway (bob@de-fac.to) wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 10:01:51PM -0700, Bob Galloway wrote:
> > > Do you have the installation stuff on the NFS export?  It may be
> > > easier to download rescue and root floppies from the potato installers
> > > and do a network install.  You'd be using a 2.2 kernel then.
> > 
> > I considered doing that, but thought that fighting with floppies a
> > second time would be more trouble than it was worth.  That was many
> > hours ago... I'll give it a go with potato.
> 
> Okay.  I just tried again with potato install disks, from the 'compact'
> series.  Same problems as with slink.  Great sadness and woe.
> 
> A recap:
>     - ifconfig reports TX packets, but no RX packets.
>     - network card works in other boxes
>     - LAN allows two other boxes to network without problems.  Swapping
>         cables has no effect; the problem is probably not in the ethernet
>         hardware.
>     - curiously enough, if I ping from the problem box to a good box
>         (2.2 install disks have ping! yay!), I don't see any RX packets
>         on the good box, though I see TX packets on the bad box.  (If I
>         ping from the good box to the bad box, I see TX packets on the
>         good box, and nothing at all on the bad box, as I expected.
>         In both cases, I see network activity on the hub coming from
>         the box running ping, and nothing from the target box.)
> 
> This has me greatly confused.  If the problem is just that the bad
> box can't receive packets, then why doesn't a good box report recieved
> packets when the bad box pings it?  The hub is reporting packets going
> out, so the card on the bad box is sending something out there, but an
> otherwise good box doesn't see it.  
> 
> I don't get it... it's as if there's two different networks here, one
> for the bad box and one for everything else.  That's nuts, since apart
> from the host IP (.7 instead of .2) everything in ifconfig/route is the
> same in the bad box as it is in this box, which is networking nicely.
> 
> Maybe it'll make sense in the morning.  Always, TIA.

I don't know if you've posted your config settings from the bad box
itself.  What's ifconfig and route output for this puppy?

Any firewalling going on?

Nothing funky with the hub itself?  Have you tried bouncing it?

Um...do I know you?

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>          http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?             There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/               http://www.kuro5hin.org
   Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA!    http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire                        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html

Attachment: pgpzvo8cVdGCa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: