Re: networking problem during install
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:33:04PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Okay. I just tried again with potato install disks, from the 'compact'
> > series. Same problems as with slink. Great sadness and woe.
> >
> > A recap:
> > - ifconfig reports TX packets, but no RX packets.
> > - network card works in other boxes
> > - LAN allows two other boxes to network without problems. Swapping
> > cables has no effect; the problem is probably not in the ethernet
> > hardware.
> > - curiously enough, if I ping from the problem box to a good box
> > (2.2 install disks have ping! yay!), I don't see any RX packets
> > on the good box, though I see TX packets on the bad box. (If I
> > ping from the good box to the bad box, I see TX packets on the
> > good box, and nothing at all on the bad box, as I expected.
> > In both cases, I see network activity on the hub coming from
> > the box running ping, and nothing from the target box.)
> >
> > This has me greatly confused. If the problem is just that the bad
> > box can't receive packets, then why doesn't a good box report recieved
> > packets when the bad box pings it? The hub is reporting packets going
> > out, so the card on the bad box is sending something out there, but an
> > otherwise good box doesn't see it.
> >
> > I don't get it... it's as if there's two different networks here, one
> > for the bad box and one for everything else. That's nuts, since apart
> > from the host IP (.7 instead of .2) everything in ifconfig/route is the
> > same in the bad box as it is in this box, which is networking nicely.
> >
> > Maybe it'll make sense in the morning. Always, TIA.
>
> I don't know if you've posted your config settings from the bad box
> itself. What's ifconfig and route output for this puppy?
ifconfig:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:78:58:F0:1D
inet addr:10.1.1.7 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:732 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xfc00
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:381 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:381 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
route -n:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
Which is essentially the same as the box I'm writing this on, except
that this good box has an IP of .2, and has several eth0 RX packets
(and a couple dozen errors, but the number doesn't increase with testing).
So similar, in fact, that I cut'n'pasted this box's output, and manually
changed the numbers (a thing I wouldn't have to do if I had a network...)
I didn't have to change the route output at all.
> Any firewalling going on?
I've disabled all firewalling when testing (after unplugging the DSL line.)
> Nothing funky with the hub itself? Have you tried bouncing it?
Tried bouncing it. No change. Swapping cables doesn't help, either.
I'll try to get my hands on a crossover cable, just to cover all bases.
> Um...do I know you?
You sound familiar. Qatar, 1964?
--
Bob Galloway A single day of
Experience is worth a
Decade of Usenet.
Reply to: