Re: mod-ssl vs apache-ssl

[Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>]

"der.hans" <deb-user@LuftHans.com> writes:
> BTW, the previous consensus seemed to be run whatever you want :).

  My problem is that I don't know what I want ;-).

  What is Debian policy about adding features to apache? Are
  developers required to add the features to apache-ssl too, or
  required to *not* add the features (to keep it "stable"), or is it
  optional?

  If it's the latter two, I think running apache + mod-ssl would be
  the most flexible, allowing my apache install to take advantage of
  future updates. Right?

-- 
Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.