Re: small school: replacements for MS Word and Excel
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 02:03:02AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
:Sean Morgan <macinslak@mac.com> wrote:
:>OK, the two messages previous posts kind of play off eachother so I'm
:>going to reply to them in one go. First off ext2, it has a really bad
:>habit of losing files in hard crashes and power outages, this isn't a
:>problem for someone like you or I as we know how to recover them, for a
:>student with no root and no knowledge of how to do this, it's called a
:>couple of hours work down the tubes.
:
:I have to say, I've never lost a file to an ext2 disk crash, nor even
:had to go any further than the odd prompted "run fsck manually" to
:recover it,
On extremely flaky hardware, such as Colin goes on to describe, I have
"lost" file on ext2, but only in extreme cases. And I put "lost" in
quotes because I know that they're in the lost-found directory, just
with a weird name and some careful use of `file` and `grep` has gotten
them back. Though honestly even with crashes under load this doesn't
often happen, and even in the rare cases when it does 99% of those are
just netscape cache files I don't care about.
NTFS and FAT on the other hand I've lost system files that render the
machine unbootable (happened on 3 systems in the past 2 months), I
haven't lost a file on ext2 ever and the last "lost" file was about 6
months ago.
Linux beats out M$ in my lab atleast 2 to 1. The only Un*x system
I've really had a lot of trouble with was a Solaris UFS file system on
a very old drive that just went insane while mounted and under heavy
NFS use (got that back with fsck too, eventually).
So in my experience ext2 is much more robust than M$ offerings.
Reiserfs is *probably* a bit better <hearsay>though I hear when
journaled filesystems do manage to get wedged it's all over
</hearsay>. RAID mirroring is also an option for the paranoid (not to
suggest paranoia is always unwarrented), but this is probably a bit
more technicaly complex than you want to get.
-Jon
Reply to: