Re: reiserfs installation
I've been running reiserfs with 2.4.3 on a /doc partition which basically
houses my mp3s - so it's constantly being accessed - for a couple of weeks,
with no difficulties.
That's not exactly heavy useage though.
On Monday 30 April 2001 16:49, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:15:20PM -0800, Ethan Benson
(erbenson@alaska.net) wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:47:06PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> > > Renai LeMay wrote:
> > > > I've been using reiserfs on my /doc partition for a while, and am
> > > > very impressed with it's performance.
> > >
> > > It is fast, indeed. And fsck'ing no more :-)
> >
> > not true, when (and i say when) the kernel corrupts the filesystem you
> > WILL need to fsck it, and unfortuantly reiserfsck sucks.
>
> My understanding is that most current reiserfs issues involve 2.4
> kernels. ReiserFS under 2.2.18+ is pretty stable. 2.4 is not
> recommended unless you're involved in reiserfs development or hate
> yourself (or the "friend" whose system you're configuring ;-)
----------------------------------------
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset="us-ascii";
name="Attachment: 1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description:
----------------------------------------
Reply to: