On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 11:53:27AM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote: > > well, shouldn't be this considered ad ld.so bug? maybe, if it is i doubt its anywhere near trivial to fix (but im not sure of that). (don't bother with chmod -x someone already tried that on -devel awhile back, be prepared to have sash already running to fix your broken system) > of course I know about shell scripts. But i think the main difference is > shell scripts shouldn't make harm as binaries can. perl is about as powerful as any C program, good luck removing perl. IMO trying to prevent people from running binaries is a generally losing battle. its better to protect things more fundementally, use quotas and resource limits, restrict suid binaries, use nosuid,nodev on most filesystems etc. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgp8dciIBoWze.pgp
Description: PGP signature