[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lm-sensors with kernel-package



Hallo Jens!

Am Mit, 28 Mär 2001, schrieb Jens Gecius:

> > There are no /dev/i2c files around. How can I create them. Is there a
> > skript?
> 
> Sorry, I forgot: if you want to use the i2c-interface, you also need
> the i2c-source package. These are some additional modules to make
> available the i2c-devices. Same procedure as with lm-sensors.

There is a i2c-source in the lm-sensors-source package and many
i2c-modules were created.

debian:/lib/modules/2.2.18pre21/misc> ls -l i*
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        11828 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-algo-bit.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7724 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-algo-pcf.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         6688 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-ali15x3.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         5544 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-amd756.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        18412 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-core.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         6000 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-dev.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         4888 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-elektor.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         3600 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-elv.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         3188 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-hydra.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7348 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-i801.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2724 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-isa.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         3220 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-philips-par.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         6564 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-piix4.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         5416 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-sis5595.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         3372 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-velleman.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         3580 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-via.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7068 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-viapro.o
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         9460 Mar 28 11:34 i2c-voodoo3.o
 
> But the isa-interface should work just fine. 

So what shall I do?

I think I miss something in /dev but what?

Ciao!
juh

-- 
"Das Wort "Verben" schreibt man nicht mit W sondern mit Vogel-F."
Tristan Hasecke.



Reply to: