Re: Fwd: File updates req'd for network(2nd try)
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:57:06PM -0600, ktb wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:41:57PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:47:00PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > > iface eth1 inet static
> > > address 192.168.1.1
> > > netmask 255.255.255.0
> > > network 192.168.0.0
> > > broadcast 192.168.1.255
> >
> > This is wrong. Well, I don't have experience that indicates that it
> > doesn't *work*, but it's still wrong. Look closely at the values...one
> > of them doesn't match the others. Network is not compatible with the
> > rest of the values. You say you're on network 192.168.0.0, but your IP
> > address is 192.168.1.1 with a netmask of 255.255.255.0. You should
> > change network to 192.168.0.0
> >
>
> Did you mean change the network to 192.168.1.0 ?
OK, I did make this change and it seemed to make some difference,
but the connectivity is VERY "iffy", meaning most everything times
out. I'm now showing a TRUCKLOAD of errors on eth1 if I run an
ifconfig.
----
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:E8:2A:BD
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:682 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:15 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:30
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe800
----
Any more ideas. Intersting that with only the one other PC on a
crossover cable, that the "Network" setting did not seem to make a
difference...
Are there route commands that need to be issued?(That's a wild
guess, based on answers I've seen to similar questions) I'm clueless
about route, and the man page went right over my head. :(
jdk
Reply to: