Re: Grub vs LILO

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Grub vs LILO
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Date: 17 Jan 2001 15:42:27 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 84wvbu3i30.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
In-reply-to: cliff@raggedclown.net's message of "16 Jan 01 05:01:40 GMT"
References: <[🔎] 200101111228.AA3539076@mail.cybernetisp.net> <[🔎] 84k881bsry.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 87vgrhlyd1.fsf@wabe.germanistik.uni-bonn.de> <[🔎] 84itngz7y7.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 20010116060140.C1015@raggedclown.net>

>>>>> "Cliff" == Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> writes:

    Cliff> Well, I think like any software that manipulates
    Cliff> fundamnental locations on your disk drives, like boot
    Cliff> sectors, it is not suprising that it warns you that you
    Cliff> have no-one to complain to if it doesn't work .. lol. It is
    Cliff> erring on the side of over-worrying you ...

I have never seen any warnings like that for lilo...

Perhaps I didn't look hard enough?
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Reply to:

References:
- Grub vs LILO
  - From: "Tom Schuetz" <ts22548@mail.cybernetisp.net>
- Re: Grub vs LILO
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: Grub vs LILO
  - From: Joachim Trinkwitz <jtr@uni-bonn.de>
- Re: Grub vs LILO
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Re: Grub vs LILO
  - From: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net>

Prev by Date: Re: cdrecord problems
Next by Date: Re: cdrecord problems
Previous by thread: Re: Grub vs LILO
Next by thread: Re: Grub vs LILO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread