Re: apt-get upgrade behaviour versus apt-get install package with respect to netscape,
Michael P Soulier <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
MPS> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 11:08:34AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote:
WT> New versions of currently installed packages that cannot be
WT> upgraded without changing the install status of another package
WT> will be left at their current version. An update must be
WT> performed first so that apt-get knows that new versions of
WT> packages are available.
MPS> I'm not sure how to read that. During an upgrade, you almost
MPS> always have to change the install status of another package, so
MPS> how does that work?
If package foo upgrades from version 0.0-1 to 0.0-2 without changing
dependencies, apt-get upgrade will go ahead and upgrade it. If
package bar upgrades from version 0.1-3 to 0.2-1, but version 0.2-1
also has a dependency on libbaz1 which wasn't previously installed,
APT won't do the upgrade (because libbaz1 would change from "purge" to
apt-get dist-upgrade *will* go ahead and upgrade everything,
regardless of what the new dependency situation is.
David Maze email@example.com http://www.mit.edu/~dmaze/
"Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal."
-- Abra Mitchell