Re: Begone, vile emacs!
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 05:42:28PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> >> why not dpkg -l emacs ?
>
> jm> un emacs <none> (no description available)
>
> It's probably "emacs19" or "emacs20", or one of the xemacs varieties.
Neither! It's really strange.
> The simplest way to find out what package a particuler file belongs to
> is with dpkg -S; try something like:
>
> $ dpkg -S bin/emacs
Not there either. I've decided to *install* emacs (19, I believe, from my
locate database) and then PURGE the fiend. Please don't turn me in to the
joe user's emacs resistance...
> "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
... dot com. (The domain is available for E-mail forwarding from mail.com)
(Great .sig... And I just noticed mine... ahh, Espy...)
--
Jonathan Markevich <jmarkevich@mad.scientist.com>
http://www.geocities.com/jmarkevich
== It's VIRUSES, not VIRII! See http://language.perl.com/misc/virus.html ==
<Espy> tomorrow there will be a great disturbance in the workforce
-- May 18, 1999
Reply to: