[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pgp vs. mutt

What version of mutt are you using?  If I remember correctly, for the
potato version you need to add "set pgp_default_version = gpg" or
similar to ~/.muttrc.

On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:15:58PM -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:49:15PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
> > Hi Will, 
> > 
> > A lot of people on this list are probably using GnuPG (gpg), which is a
> > GNU replacement for PGP. As long as you have a non-us line in your apt
> > cources.list do an apt-get install gnupg.
> so i did
> # apt-get --purge remove pgp-i pgp-us
> # apt-get install gnupg
> mutt is now back to displaying
> 	[-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Sep 14 13:08:42 2000) --]
> 	sh: /usr/bin/pgp: No such file or directory
> 	[-- End of PGP output --]
> for any email from anyone who's got a signed missive. argh!
> i see that /usr/share/doc/mutt/examples/pgp-macros talks about
> setting up the outbound portion (so far i haven't been able
> to consider anything i've said quite important enough to
> etch in digitally-signed stone yet) but i don't see where
> the settings are to direct it to parse (or whatever) incoming
> messages for verification.
> which setting is it that's obvious to everyone else?
> --
> p.s. all this paranoia about "you can verify that i actually
> posted 'rtfm' " seems a bit overblown, to me. what's the big
> deal?
> i probably should just leave it a lone and let mutt keep
> looking for /usr/bin/pgp through eternity.

Attachment: pgptghTPPuF8c.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: