[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cc: to poster (was Re: OT: less v. more...)

On 04 Aug 2000, Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@msu.edu> wrote:
> See, the thing is, I didn't start this thread of discussion and
> I'm not at all interested in a rehash of this topic.  And what's
> more, I already asked on debian-user to be dropped from CC:'s.

 ROTFL 8-))  Here you can see quite clearly that it's not a good idea to
Cc: one when replying. For my person I stated quite soon (after the
first mail I got that was Cc:ed to -user) that I don't read that special

> So, if you'd just not email me any more about it, I'd greatly
> appreciate it.

 It would be a good idea to start with the things you request yourself.
I don't speak of my person, but that you Cc:ed Bolan who also wrote
quite often that he _is_ on -user and don't need to be Cc:ed.

 I think I will skip the comfort of noticing it on the list and send a
seperate mail to everyone that Cc:es me. This will destroy the
additional feature that other might read it and react appropriately but
on the other hand will stop such mega threads.

 Have fun!
"Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the
usual way.  This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody
thinks of complaining."
                -- Jeff Raskin, interviewed in Doctor Dobb's Journal

Reply to: