[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Licq from KDE2?



On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 11:42:15PM -0400, Bart Szyszka wrote:
> 
> Has anyone had luck getting the latest Licq to work with the latest KDE2
> version from kde.tdyc.com ? When I try installing licq-plugin-qt2 it wants to 
> remove all the KDE2 packages, including libqt2.1 (and do libqt2 instead). 

That's odd, since just about all recent versions of licq practically
require Qt 2.1. Note that the Debian package is rather out of date,
latest prerelease is 0.85 beta 2, latest stable is 0.81. IIRC, 0.81 was
the first to depend on features/bugfixes in the Qt libs, which may
explain why the deb remains at 0.80 (until an official qt 2.1 deb
appears).

Probably the best thing to do in this situation is to compile licq from
source. Either apt-get source, make an entry in the changelog,
'debian/rules binary' and dpkg -i the results; or just install the
latest into /usr/local. Either way, that should fix the dependancy
problems. (If you want to try the SSL features of 0.85, you'll need an
updated libssl09 -- licq needs functions introduced in 0.9.5. More info
available on request)

Technically, it's not even necessary to edit the changelog, but i've
run into problems with the system wanting to replace my version with the
identically-numbered version (yes, i checked epochs) from the Debian
mirror, unless i properly set up a local mirror and put that first into
sources.list. So, i tend to add an entry explaining what i've done (good
practice anyway) and give it a version number .0001 greater (e.g.
0.80-3 to 0.80-3.0001).

> That licq-plugin-qt2 isn't actually a dependency, from the looks of things, 
> of Licq, but when I run Licq without it, I get:
> 23:41:39: [ERR] Unable to load plugin (qt-gui): /usr/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so: 
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory.   

You _could_ use one of the other UI plugins; there's a few GTK-based and
one that runs in a console. i've never tried any of them, so i can't
speak for how well they work. I don't know if they've been Debianized
yet.


-- 
  finger for GPG public key.

Attachment: pgpQswHQieQPd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: