RE: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]
Tried ps ax?
Work Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Dominic Blythe wrote:
> i'm getting into this debate.
> what's the switches for ps that'll show all the daemons i'm running?
> just ps just gives me the obvious processes.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ethan Benson [mailto:email@example.com]
> > Sent: 28 April 2000 15:45
> > To: w trillich
> > Cc: John Pearson; firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: Re: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name
> > resolution]
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 08:59:34AM -0500, w trillich wrote:
> > >
> > > nfs = network fileshare system (or similar)? as in, a windows user
> > > can see a volume icon on their desktop from the linux box? don't
> > > need that... (the appletalk stuff is still operational... does
> > > it need NFS?)
> > no, NFS == Network File System (more accuratly known as No File
> > Security ;-) it is for exporting parts/all of your filesystem to
> > other *nix hosts, while its possible to export to win* boxes its a
> > very bad idea (unless you squash all uids and export read-only) since
> > exporting to win* user == giving out root access. (this is true of
> > any NFS export unless you exclusivly control root on all client
> > machines, hence the No File Security comment) for exporting to win*
> > you want samba. exporting to macos users you want netatalk (afpd,
> > atalkd, papd) if you need none of the above then for petes sake shut
> > it off!
> > --
> > Ethan Benson
> > http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe email@example.com < /dev/null