Re: more real runlevels?

To: "Brad" <lists@anomie.ods.org>, <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: more real runlevels?
From: "Eugene Teo" <eugeneteo@eugeneteo.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 21:25:49 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 00cf01bfb115$4ee4f2c0$aeda15a5@idoru>
References: <[🔎] 87vh13zbu6.fsf@amazon.lbin.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0004271942340.1907-100000@ugly.wh8.tu-dresden.de> <[🔎] 20000427131742.T4619@cmc.net> <[🔎] 20000427225249.A31016@anomie.ods.org>

I agree, besides that, if you regretted changing it from S -> K,
you can undo the sequence ;)

Eugene (eugeneteo@eugeneteo.net)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brad" <lists@anomie.ods.org>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 11:52
Subject: Re: more real runlevels?

Reply to:

References:
- more real runlevels?
  - From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@lbin.com>
- Re: more real runlevels?
  - From: Oswald Buddenhagen <ob6@inf.tu-dresden.de>
- Re: more real runlevels?
  - From: brian moore <bem@cmc.net>
- Re: more real runlevels?
  - From: Brad <lists@anomie.ods.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian Security
Next by Date: Re: Any interest in an Aureal Vortex soundcard driver .debs?
Previous by thread: Re: more real runlevels?
Next by thread: Re: more real runlevels?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread