[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FDISK parameters was Re: undelete for partition tables?



	Subject: Re: FDISK parameters was Re: undelete for partition tables?
	Date: Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:54:47PM +0000

In reply to:Ed Cogburn

Quoting Ed Cogburn(ecogburn@greene.xtn.net):
> Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> > 
> > Ed Cogburn wrote:
> > 
> 
> 
> 	I just tried (as root) the three fdisk examples (-l is lowercase
> L) given above.  Only the last one worked: "fdisk -l /dev/hda". 
> The -u does nothing at all.  Does anybody else see this behavior,
> or has my fdisk been lobotomized somehow?
> 

Ed

VT2 root-Deb-Slink:~/mysql# fdisk -v
fdisk v2.9g


VT2 root-Deb-Slink:~/mysql# fdisk -l /dev/hda

Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1027 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot   Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1            1       31   248976    b  Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2           32       63   257040    6  DOS 16-bit >=32M
/dev/hda3           64       95   257040   83  Linux native
/dev/hda4           96     1027  7486290    5  Extended
/dev/hda5           96      248  1228941   83  Linux native
/dev/hda6          249      281   265041   83  Linux native
/dev/hda7          282      320   313236   83  Linux native
/dev/hda8          321      335   120456   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda9          336      476  1132551   83  Linux native
/dev/hda10         477      623  1180746   83  Linux native
/dev/hda11         624      750  1020096   83  Linux native
/dev/hda12         751     1027  2224971   83  Linux native

VT2 root-Deb-Slink:~/mysql# fdisk -u /dev/hda

The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 1027.
There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
and could in certain setups cause problems with:
1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., LILO)
2) booting and partitioning software from other OSs
   (e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK)

Command (m for help):

HTH

Wayne 
-- 
Error reading FAT record: Try the SKINNY one? (Y/N)
_______________________________________________________


Reply to: