Re: IglooFTP goes commercial. Violation of GPL?
%% Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch> writes:
jv> Contrary to popular opinion the FSF is _not_ the sole copyright
jv> holder of GNU Emacs. The copyright to FSF Emacs is jointly held by
jv> the FSF and the Electrotechnical Laboratory (which is the Japanese
jv> government research institute that is responsible for Mule).
How do you determine this?
All the copyright statements I saw in 20.4 after a quick check were
merely by the FSF, including such docs as etc/DISTRIB.
That's quite fascinating if true. I wonder what the story is behind
this; RMS has never been willing to do this before, and for him to bend
like this simply to integrate what is, quite frankly, not a very good
implementation of i18n (IMO, of course) is interesting to say the least.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <psmith@baynetworks.com> Network Management Development
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.
Reply to: