RE: Sound - ALSA or kernel?
In my limited experiance I must say that the ALSA approach worked much
smoother and easier than the OSS eqvivliant. Thats with my Awe 64 ISA PNP
and I even got it working with two soundcards at the same time, thats hard
to do (if not impossible) with the OSS modules.
/nisse
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brendon Baumgartner wrote:
> Hmm, you'll have to use isapnp for it. I know there is a awe howto out there
> also. Another thing is to check the kernel docs. There is some awe stuff in
> there. Good luck. From my soundcard experiences, using oss in the kernel is
> much easier. I hear alsa is better, but if you don't need its "betterness"
> ... go the easy way till alsa is mroe integrated and improved.
>
> bb
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carley, Jason (Australia) [mailto:jason_carley@exchange.au.ml.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 10:46 PM
> To: 'debian-user list'
> Subject: Sound - ALSA or kernel?
>
>
> I was after ideas on the best way to get my Awe 64 running under slink.
> Should I use the ALSA drivers or the kernel modules. Under SuSE I had great
> difficulty with isapnp issues and the kernel modules.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org <
> /dev/null
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: