RE: StarOffice
> "the Linux part"? It's a binary that links to standard source code;
> there is no linux code in it. It would be a civil & criminal copyright
> violation to distribute the binary without permission
What I mean by the Linux part is that there IS a version freely available. I
agree there's no real "part" of linux in StarOffice.
Copyright laws applies when things are free?
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: StarOffice
- From: "Richard E. Hawkins Esq." <hawk@eyry.econ.iastate.edu>
- References:
- Re: StarOffice
- From: "Richard E. Hawkins Esq." <hawk@eyry.econ.iastate.edu>