Re: Fwd: Re: dselect oddities
On 16 May 1998 00:22:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>Steve> Exactly. I have been giving constructive critism and in return
>Steve> I have been getting a flippant attitude of "It isn't that many
>Steve> ketstrokes." In fact, one person has said that if the
>Steve> situation were reverse he(?)'d find it unacceptable yet is
>Steve> asking that I find it acceptable that I must do what he would
>Steve> not if things were reversed.
> That happens not to be the case. If the reverse were true:
> that all packages were held be default, and I had to do two
> ops to turn them t be upgraded. I would do it. If I had to release
> them one by one, that would be unacceptable.
> For gods sake, read before you flame.
I did. I asked you if the reverse were true, if you had to select what
you wanted to upgrade, would you find it unaccetable. You said you would.
What part of my statement above does not conform to that? I can go back
and quote from the exact messages, if you like. It wasn't a flame, it was
fact.
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: