Re: ssltelnet *very* slow on a 486...
Jules Bean wrote:
> Now, I can understand that a 486/100 is not the fastest machine around.
> But I can't see why there should be a difference of about 2 orders of
> magnitude between a 486/100 and a Pentium 133. Also - and tellingly -
> in.telnetd is not taking up CPU time on the machine during this time. If
> I watch 'top', in.telnetd takes up CPU for maybe a few seconds, and
> thereafter the machine is idle.
Try attaching a strace to it (strace -p <pid of in.telnetd>), and see if you
can figure out what it's doing by the system calls it runs.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: