Re: Problem with ppp-2.3.3-5 and authentication
Sorry about the delay in responding James, we had a 'significant'
storm roll through yesterday...
I don't know the mechanism for how the authentication actually
takes place for PAP but it looks to me as though you are either
asking for or giving the 'null string' as a password for any
user at <hostname>.
The format for the entries is (AFAIK):
<user> <hostname> <secret> [<ip address(es)>]
>From the ppp manpage, it looks as though there are several ways
that figuring out the correct hostname for the remote system
could get fouled up. Also, <user> could either be from the
'user' option or just be the hostname of your system.
I don't think that there is any interaction between PAP or
CHAP and your account password (as in /etc/passwd).
On Thu, May 07, 1998 at 04:17:11PM +1100, James Whitwell wrote:
> On 6/5/98 1:18 AM Bill Leach wrote:
> >My question would be, if Mr. Whitwell's machine is using PAP, are the
> >entries in the ppp/pap-secrets file correct? AFAIK for the PAP
> >authentication to work (I don't use PAP but have used CHAP), the
> >Username, password, and IP address (or address range) have to match.
> [Mr. Whitwell speaks]
> I think they're OK. In "/etc/ppp/pap-secrets" I have:
> * <hostname> ""
> which the installation script put in, and which I haven't changed
> (<hostname> is, of course, the name of the machine being dialed-up).
Do you mean 'dialing in' to this machine or being 'dialed-up' BY this
machine? (I originally thought the former, also supported by the
> I basically haven't changed anything from the default mgetty and ppp
> In "/etc/ppp/options", I uncommented an "ms-dns" line and added our DNS.
> I copied "/etc/options.ttyXX" to "/etc/ppp/options.ttyS1" and changed it
> to read "<hostname>:<serial-port-ip>". Both of these are in our DNS.
> In "/etc/mgetty/login.config" I have:
> /AutoPPP/ - a_ppp /usr/sbin/pppd auth -chap +pap login
> which is unchanged from the installation (I don't seem to be having any
> problems with mgetty in any case).
> The client machines (that dial the Linux box) are a mix of Mac (running
> OT/PPP 1.0.1) and Windows 95 machines. Both have worked before with the
> previous ppp (I think it was 2.2.0-f-<mumblemumble>).
> Can anyone see anything that I've missed. I'd be thankful for any
> further comments anyone can make.
The only thing that I can see that appears wrong to me is that there
actually is no secret in your pap-secrets file.
from a 1996 Micro$loth ad campaign:
"The less you know about computers the more you want Micro$oft!"
See! They do get some things right!
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org