[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upgrading to hamm



On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 12:29:39AM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
> There are some rather severe problems with memory corruption.  Generally,
> you will only see them on busy systems. Other problems include memory
> leaks, filesystem problems and system hangs. There are also networking
> issues. 2.0.33 is pretty bad. It DID introduce some hardware support that
> other kernels did not have.
> 
> You are better off with 2.0.32 until 2.0.34 which I hope will be out
> pretty soon. It is currently at pre7 or 8. See freshmeat for details on
> where to find it if you want to build it.

I have 2.0.33 running on an ABIT IT5H 2.0, K6-233 w/ 64 megs of RAM.
It's rock solid, but when I add another 64 megs, things start to segfault
all over the place.  Is that a symptom of this problem?  Should I switch
to 2.0.32 or 34pre?  My K6 is one of the ">32M bug free" ones.

I suspected the memory immediately and took it out.  But it appears to
be good stuff -- 60ns Micron EDO, just like what was already in there.
Naturally, it also passes every memory test I throw at it.

Thanks,

Jeff


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: