On Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 03:42:12PM -0600, Tamas Papp wrote: > My problem was that I couldn't not substitute kernel-headers-2.0.32 with > kernel-headers-2.0.33 in the sense that libc6-dev depends on the former > but it doesn't accept the latter instead, so my problem was a dependency > problem. I deleted the 2.0.32 headers and symlinks, then just changed the symlinks to inside /usr/src/linux/, which seemed to make a few probrams happier when compiling. I have to fix these symlinks everytime I unstall new libc6-dev and naturally I have to make sure /usr/src/linux is linked to something useful (at the moment /usr/src/kernel/linux which is in turn linked to /usr/src/kernel/linux-2.1.95--aren't symlinks fun?) Why the extra kernel dir? I use kernel-package which puts a kernel-image .deb in the dir above the kernel directory, which is normally /usr/src by most conventions. This behavior is undesirable to me, so I place all my package-related things in subdirs, .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz, .dsc, .deb, and the source code. This idea came from the qmail-src package before I started rebuilding packages for my own needs (I can build a fresh package but it's a very slow process since I do not yet know all the tools to make it easier) so I suppose I've kinda done it since I started doing things this way, but. At any rate, it may not be the best way but it works.
Attachment:
pgpaBWULaQz84.pgp
Description: PGP signature