Re: statically linked ls ???
If you need it because you screwed up libc so ls doesn't work but bash does
then you can always use this alternative:
echo *
This will print all the files in the current directory since the shell will
do the wildcard expansion. Yes, I have screwed up my own libc before!
Xavier Bergade wrote:
> I'd need a statically linked ls (ie no need of lib/ld-linux.so.1 and
> lib/libc.so.5)
>
> Is there any binary already available?
> If not how can I do it myself? (I have the fileutils source tar)
>
> thanx.
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
> Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
--
Jens B. Jorgensen
jjorgens@bdsinc.com
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: