Re: How unstable is hamm?
On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, John Bradley Fitzgibbons wrote:
>
>I've been watching all of the messages concerning libc6 upgrades and now
>I've just got to ask. How unstable is hamm? My major interest is due to
>development. I'd really like to start playing around with version 6, but
>I'd hate to destroy my system to do it... :) I have an admin level
>knowledge of unix so feel free to be honest with me. Thanks in advance
>for any input.
Can't be too bad if Redhat is basing 5.0 on it... And its considered
released. (Although, I think 2.0.5c is still considered beta, wasn't
2.1 supposed to be the commercial grade release?)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: