Re: diald vs ipmasquerade
>
> At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +0000, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
> >Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
> >Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
> >The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
> >on the unit that has the modem on it. And would like the other units
> >to access the internet via the modem on LINUX unit.
> >So I have diald running on the linux. The windows node have the
> >linux unit as their gateway. But if I ping an IP diald doesn't dial.
You cannot ping an IP. You have to ping an address that must be looked up
like:
server.no.where.net
Otherwise diald assumes that the ip in on your local net and no dial is
nessasary.
I have basically the same setup as you do, so give me a ring if you need help.
-Brian
> >
> >What next ?
> >
> As you suspect you need to recompile the kernel with ip masquerading. You
> will also want to add ipfwadm rules.
>
> Good luck
>
> Joe.
>
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
> Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>
--
Brian Rectanus
Kansas State University
Computing and Informational Sciences
Multimedia/Web Programmer
trojan@cis.ksu.edu
http://www.cis.ksu.edu/~trojan
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: