Re: make-kpkg error....
Hi,
>>"David" == David Wright <D.Wright@open.ac.uk> writes:
David> On 23 Sep 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Well, there is no difference between arch//boot/bzImage and
>> arch/boot/bzImage, really, when it come to cp. I suspect that the
>> image did not build, for some reason.
David> Perhaps you've overlooked the fact that, though the filename
David> syntax might be legal, the architecture is missing;
David> i.e. .../alpha/..., .../i386/... etc.
AUUgh! Bug! Bug, I say! this should be reported.
Earlier in the build process, the architecture is set so:
architecture:=$(shell dpkg --print-architecture)
What does dpkg --print-architecture show? what's in
/etc/kernel-pkg.conf?
what version of kernel-package is being used? Something is
strange on this machine, since if it were a general problem, I would
have been deafened by the howls of outrage that would naturally
ensue.
manoj
--
If at first you don't succeed, you are running about average.
Manoj Srivastava <url:mailto:srivasta@acm.org>
Mobile, Alabama USA <url:http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: