Re: Show me the money Re: Donations to Debian
>>"Clint" == Clint Adams <email@example.com> writes:
>> A while ago we held a vote on the leadership of the project. The
>> developers strongly rejected the idea of a "Roman Senate" where all
>> decisions would be voted upon. They prefered to have an elected
>> executive and ratified me to
Clint> As did I. However, I think it's slightly stretching the point
Clint> to claim that "we, the developers" decided something which was
Clint> an executive decision following a developer discussion with no
Clint> clear consensus. Even more troubling, though, are the calls to
Clint> squelch dissent because of it.
If you do not think that the discussion came to a conclusion
(BTW, Bruce did shift from his original proposal), then the proper
forum is debian-devel. I did not see your s=comments there. Nobody is
squashing dissent. All we are saying that that's the way the
developers want it. If you disagree, shift over to debian-devel and
we shall attempt for consensus.
Saint: A dead sinner revised and edited. Ambrose Bierce
Manoj Srivastava <url:mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
Mobile, Alabama USA <url:http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .