Re: 1.1 memory management issue ??

[Martin Konold <konold@fiwi02.wiwi.uni-tuebingen.de>]

On Sun, 29 Dec 1996, David B. Teague wrote:

Hi there,

> > Thank heavens! 1.1 had terrible memory management. 1.2 (REX) is _much_ 
> > better. 
> 
> The memory management issue mentioned here with 1.1 may explain some
> slowness with my (1.1) machines. 

I do not get the point! Memory management is the job of the kernel.
How does it depend on the distribution?

Yours,
-- martin

// Martin Konold, Muenzgasse 7, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany  // 
// Email: konold@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de              // 
       Linux - because reboots are for hardware upgrades 
       -- Edwin Huffstutler <ehuff@sedona.intel.com> -- 

   Just go ahead and write your own multitasking multiuser os !
                 Worked for me all the times.
                     -- Linus Torvalds --


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com