Re: make-kpgk modules troubles
Hi Thomas --
A while ago you asked:
> Until recently, I just rolled my own kernel as I was used to do
> with Slackware. But since I found out about make-kpkg, I decided
> to do things the Debian way and use that instead. After much hassle
> wit the broken tar (solved by downgrading), there's still a problem:
> Whenever I try to make a modules package for my system, I end up
> with a message like "Modules not configured, so not making modules".
Then Joey Hess replied:
>Sorry, I can't help you with your problem, but this does raise a question
>in my mind: what exactly is the benefit of using the kernel-package vs.
>rolling your own kernel?
The following might be useful input for both questions:
make-kpkg provides a kernel-image package that can be managed and manipulated
like other Debian packages. The accessibility of all the files involved
in upgrading a kernel to the Debian tools is an advantage, especially if
one is trying out many kernel configurations and/or versions.
Once I run
make-kpkg kernel_image
it is very easy to make a new copy of the Debian boot disk, using the
boot-floppies package:
cd /usr/src/bootfloppies-1.1.1
./bootdisk.sh kernel-image-2.0.whatever.deb /dev/fd0 1440
This makes a handy emergency boot disk (even though its initial primary
design was for installation.) One can't use the boot floppies script
without the kernel-image .deb file.
HTH,
Susan Kleinmann
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: