Re: famd vollkommen überflüssig?

To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: famd vollkommen überflüssig?
From: Andreas Pakulat <apaku@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:26:00 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050729172600.GA23984@morpheus.apaku.dnsalias.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050729155849.GA6079@nutrimatic.ping.de>
References: <[🔎] E1DyVlF-00051S-2D@smartmx-01.inode.at> <[🔎] 200507291632.17024@hek007.hek.uni-karlsruhe.de> <[🔎] 20050729155849.GA6079@nutrimatic.ping.de>

On 29.Jul 2005 - 17:58:49, Dirk Salva wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 04:32:15PM +0200, Christian Frommeyer wrote:
> Wieso ist der dann überhaupt drauf!?

IIRC brauchte KDE den "frueher" mal (pre 3.3 glaub ich).

Andreas

-- 
Your fly might be open (but don't check it just now).

Reply to:

References:
- famd
  - From: "Michael Dauer" <michael.dauer@aon.at>
- Re: famd
  - From: Christian Frommeyer <debian@frommeyer.name>
- famd vollkommen überflüssig?
  - From: Dirk Salva <dsalva@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Repository f. transcode 1.0
Next by Date: Re: Exim Zustellungsprobleme
Previous by thread: Re: famd vollkommen überflüssig?
Next by thread: Re: USB-Disk - Device busy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread