Re: potato vs. woody

To: Debian Mailing-Liste <debian-user-german@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: potato vs. woody
From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:29:15 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020205222915.GE7824@server.idefix.loc>
Mail-followup-to: Debian Mailing-Liste <debian-user-german@lists.debian.org>
Reply-to: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] krause.87u1svsxma.fsf@sdbk.de>
References: <[🔎] 20020205.14324833@ips-pc6.ips.biba.uni-bremen.de> <[🔎] 20020205145221.GA348@debian.HOME> <[🔎] 20020205151218.GD63978@server.idefix.loc> <[🔎] krause.87u1svsxma.fsf@sdbk.de>

Hallo Sebastian,

* Sebastian Krause <krause@sdbk.de> [05-02-02 17:26]:
> Es werden immernoch Sicherheitspatches for potato bereitgestellt.

Das ist natürlich ein gutes Argument....

-- 
Gruss
Matthias

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: potato vs. woody
  - From: Michael Bramer <grisu@debian.org>

References:
- potato vs. woody
  - From: "Carsten Schulz" <sul@biba.uni-bremen.de>
- Re: potato vs. woody
  - From: Christopher Wessels <ghelper@gmx.net>
- Re: potato vs. woody
  - From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
- Re: potato vs. woody
  - From: Sebastian Krause <krause@sdbk.de>

Prev by Date: Re: /etc/hosts
Next by Date: Re: cvs - module
Previous by thread: Re: potato vs. woody
Next by thread: Re: potato vs. woody
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread