Re: gfortran release goal?
Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:09:05AM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> just to bring up a minor issue, there is *still* no
>> gfortran-transitioned lapack, blas, or atlas successfully built on
>> mipsel or m68k. Do you think those of us who depend on lapack/blas
>> should go ahead and upload to unstable now, or wait a little longer in
>> the hopes that at least mipsel will come through soon?
>
> m68k is no a release architecture so it's not a important problem.
> mipsel is tricker, but ot being able to build blas for > 1 month
> is quite bad. So, we have started uploading some blas/lapack
> build-depending packages regardless. I think it's pretty much
> upto each maintainer when you lose patience with a port.
>
> do you need atlas buildtime or just runtime? that package appears
> to have only compiled on ver y few archs.
I actually only need lapack and blas (not necessarily atlas), so I guess
I will go ahead and start uploading things to unstable now. Hopefully
mipsel will sort itself out in not too long.
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@gmail.com>
WWW: http://www.starplot.org/
WWW: http://people.debian.org/~kmccarty/
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751
Reply to: