On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:09:05AM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > just to bring up a minor issue, there is *still* no > gfortran-transitioned lapack, blas, or atlas successfully built on > mipsel or m68k. Do you think those of us who depend on lapack/blas > should go ahead and upload to unstable now, or wait a little longer in > the hopes that at least mipsel will come through soon? m68k is no a release architecture so it's not a important problem. mipsel is tricker, but ot being able to build blas for > 1 month is quite bad. So, we have started uploading some blas/lapack build-depending packages regardless. I think it's pretty much upto each maintainer when you lose patience with a port. do you need atlas buildtime or just runtime? that package appears to have only compiled on ver y few archs. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature