Re: New binutils uploaded for experimental (fwd)
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 09:17:09AM -0400, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > OK, I feel stupid now. I tested snapshots periodically and gave up on
> > one check error I could not fix, and I see where it is now (but it's
> > still there). Probably due to the libtool hack. Every 'make check'
> > uses the -installed- versions of the shared libraries - or just fails
> > if nothing with the right soname is installed.
> >
> > spawn /mnt/faur3/home/dan/binutils-2.9.5.0.10/builddir-single/binutils/ar rc
> > tmpdir/artest.a tmpdir/abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1 tmpdir/abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz2
> > lt-ar: error in loading shared libraries: libbfd-2.9.5.0.10.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > lt-ar: error in loading shared libraries: libbfd-2.9.5.0.10.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> >
> > FAIL: ar long file names
>
> I've seen this happen only if you build the binaries outside of the source
> tree for some reason (since rules builds it in builddir-single, it fails).
> If you'd like, I'll make a target in rules that'll run a full testsuite
> that's really just for testing purposes. I should do this anyway, but
> it's not as easy to clean up after (easily solved still).
>
> Basically, if you just want to run the testsuite, rebuild it by hand for
> now. By the next revision, I'll have a 'check' target in debian/rules.
Nope, that's not the cause. It really needs the shared libraries
installed. Same error if I build in or out of tree.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: