Re: xmltex nmu

To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Cc: debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xmltex nmu
From: Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:27:18 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r6qgn509.fsf@riesling.zuerich.kuesterei.ch>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070419063358.GF23218@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> (Norbert Preining's message of "Thu\, 19 Apr 2007 08\:33\:58 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 20070417172132.GB5359@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <[🔎] 87wt0aq4fy.fsf@riesling.zuerich.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 20070419062749.GE23218@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <[🔎] 20070419063358.GF23218@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>

Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:

> On Don, 19 Apr 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> would replace jadetex, passivetex, xmltex.
>> 
>> To be honest, all three of them suffer the same problem: Debian
>> Maintainer is a dead list, where *nobody* cares for what is going in. I
>
> Ok, I have to correct myself: xmltex and passivetex is maintained by 
> Debian XML/SGML Group <debian-xml-sgml-pkgs@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> No response to bug reports for ages...
> jadetex is maintained by OHURA Makoto <ohura@debian.org> ...

Okay, so we declare our ITH for xmltex and passivetex, and ask Ohura-san
about his wishes wrt jadetex.

Regards, Frank

-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)

Reply to:

References:
- xmltex nmu
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
- Re: xmltex nmu
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch>
- Re: xmltex nmu
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
- Re: xmltex nmu
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

Prev by Date: Re: papersize (was: Issues with and after upgrade to texlive)
Next by Date: Re: Issues with and after upgrade to texlive
Previous by thread: Re: xmltex nmu
Next by thread: SVN texlive (new) commit: r2709 - texlive-new/trunk/texlive-bin/debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread