Re: xmltex nmu
Hi Frank!
On Die, 17 Apr 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Or build texlive-htmlxml?
>
> This would be more than just what the xmltex package contains, wouldn't
> it? Are other packages affected as well?
Depending on what we want: Per default the following is included
jadetex
passivetex
tex4ht
xmlplay (currently moved to texlive-latex-extra)
xmltex
We could blacklist tex4ht (and bin-tex4htk) and re-take xmlplay, then we
would replace jadetex, passivetex, xmltex.
To be honest, all three of them suffer the same problem: Debian
Maintainer is a dead list, where *nobody* cares for what is going in. I
wrote several emails some time ago and never got any response...
> What's the proper way to declare an "ITH", intent to hijack?
debian-devel.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that
anything so mindboggingly useful could have evolved purely
by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the
final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
The argument goes something like this: `I refuse to prove
that I exist,' says God, `for proof denies faith, and
without faith I am nothing.'
The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't
it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you
exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't.
QED.'
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
Reply to: