Re: splitting fonts in two packages
On Fre, 12 Mai 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > What about a template for a rules file as this one: Please comment!!!
>
> I haven't tested it, but it looks good in general. Only one minor thing:
>
>
> [...]
> > PFBDST=usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/$(package)
>
> I am not sure if package name and canonical name in the TEXMF tree
> should be the same. If, eg, sombody where to package Adobe Utopia, the
> canonical name would be utopia, which wouldn't be a good name for the
> debian package.
Well, one can easily changes this to a more reasonable name, but as a
default it is not a bad option?!
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GREAT WAKERING (participial vb.)
Panic which sets in when you badly need to go to the lavatory and
cannot make up your mind about what book or magazine to take with you.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: