Re: tetex-doc-nonfree
Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
>
>> Good, should we leave it as tetex-doc-nonfree, or rename it as
>> tex-doc-nonfree? SO I will remove my texlive-doc-nonfree again.
>
> While gathering teTeX and TeX Live docs in one package has some appeal,
> it also brings a little problem: package versions may differ between
> both distributions, and so may the docs. It's always possible to put
> both versions in the package, but someone has to pay attention to the
> problem (notice that the docs are different, and not only because the
> older one wasn't complete enough, in which case having the newer one
> even to document the older version of the package would be a good
> thing...)
This is especially true for the ConTeXt documentation! So I think I
change my mind and am rather for separate packages.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Reply to: