Re: tetex-doc-nonfree
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I want to start a short discussion, or better hope to find some answers,
> concerning non-free docs:
>
> . Why is fontinstallationguide in tetex-doc-nonfree? In TeX live there
> is a source code which is GFDL/Debian [1]. Maybe it is not the
> exact source code? Then it would be better to compile this source code
> and include the output, or?
>
> . Same with l2kurz.tex and l2tabuen.tex, both are GFDL/Debian and
> sources are in TeX live
You are right, I didn't pay enough attention to that. Same for
pdftex-a.tex.
> Now one idea: What about one tex-doc-nonfree package which collects all
> this stuff, and do not duplicate everything. It will contain probalby
> more than it was contained in the tetex, as we will find quite some
> things in texlive, too, but for a start ...
I think this is a good idea, and I wouldn't care too much about having
documentation available for stuff that isn't installed, unless the
texlive-only part gets too big.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Reply to: