Re: tex-common and ls-R files
On Son, 06 Nov 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > No, I wouldn't suggest this. Why: User X changes the permissions of the
> > ls-R files in a way he likes. And *after* this calls dpkg-reconfigure.
>
> I don't agree here. The decision in this question is a "binary" one for
> each of the ls-R files - either they are group-writable, or they are
> not. If the user has changed the permissions (we only consider group
After re-reading the description of tex-common/managedlsr I agree. In
fact I based my previous post on the old (I know that I have rewritten
the descriptions, but well, brains are like sieves ...) description and
the name of the question, instead of the actual description.
> group-writable files will be selected. So if gets to that question and
> deselects them all, why shouldn't we follow that wish and make them all
> non-group-writable? What's the difference here to a situation where all
Completely correct. Please change the stuff as you described.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOLOB (n.)
A crease or fold in an underblanket, the removal of which involves
getting out of bed an largely remaking it.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: