Re: texdoctk-warn or perltk-warn or ...
On 10.05.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> schrieb:
> > Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi,
> >> Sounds too generic to me. No file clash in unstable, but I
> >> think, we should name it more tetex-related. Senseful name?
> >> tetex-warn?
> >
> > tetex-warn doesn't sound bad. One could also consider
> > tetex-xwarn. Or, if the program is generic enough,
> > tetex-xmessage.
>
> I'd vote for tetex-xwarn.
>
OK, sounds good. Should I write an CfV or are we done? Any other
ballots? Atsuhito?
Frank, as you already checkd in texdoctk-warn.c: Will you rename the
file only in debiamn/rules or will you rename the C-file?
H.
--
* gb notes that fdisk thinks his cdrom can store one terabyte
-- Seen on #Linux
http://hilmarpreusse.forum-rheinland.de/
Reply to: